California Housing Inventory Mystery: 206,000 Homes on MLS but is the Real Inventory 412,000 or closer to 618,000?

It is probably one of the least desirable tasks to undertake but if we are to understand the California housing market we need to look at the entire state current inventory level.  Now having access to the MLS gives us a general sense of the overall number of homes on the market but it does vary by source.  First, let us take a look at some of the largest metro areas in the state and come up with a rough estimate:

california housing inventory

No need in counting and adding the above up.  I ran the numbers and it is approximately 206,000.  Now this covers the largest regions of the state.  This number would appear to be right if we go by the latest sales data and information from the California Association of Realtors:

September 2009 sales:                  40,216

car inventory
Source:  C.A.R.

So we can do the quick math above:

206,000 / 40,216 = 5.1 months

That is relatively close to the CAR number and the data provided from their source is for August 2009 while the latest sales data and inventory data we are looking at are for September and October respectively.  Now as many are aware, a healthy market will have roughly 5 to 6 months of inventory on the market.  It would appear on the surface that we are there.  But the large X-factor is the shadow inventory.

Take for example the number of notice of defaults being sent out:

yearly-california-notice-of-defaults

Source:  Dr. Housing Bubble

So even though notice of defaults for 2009 are reaching the 475,000 mark actual defaults for the year are going at a pace of 230,000.  In other words, there is a major gap in the data.  This isn’t because loans are curing either.  Recent cure rates are under 5% and for California, they are even lower.  So most of those 475,000 notice of defaults are going to become additional inventory at some point.  In fact, how many of those 475,000 homes are even listed in the 206,000 current inventory?  That is the major question and brings up the shadow inventory trends.

A recent report from Amherst Mortgage Insight tackled this question:

shadow inventory

If we look at three or the largest metro areas in California, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego we see that shadow inventory makes up a large number of the actual unlisted housing data.  Let us breakdown each category:

Listings: This is the 206,000 category that is public and is listed on the MLS

REO Listings: Some of these are listed on the MLS but not all

Auction Listings: These are scheduled foreclosures but a large number of these do not show up on the MLS

Notice of Default: This is the enormous 475,000 number above.  The bulk of this is not even on the MLS

So using the above ratios of shadow inventory for these three areas and applying it to California, we get a figure of roughly:

206,000 x 2 =      412,000 homes

206×000 x 3 =     618,000 homes

Now this is an enormous difference from the listed 206,000 homes.  In fact, some areas like San Bernardino, Riverside, and the Central Valley will have larger shadow inventory because they are in higher amounts of distress.

With so many moratoriums, banks not moving on homes, and low end buyers the current market is no where close to an equilibrium.  We can make the mistake of only looking at the MLS data and assuming things are fine.  Given the NOD count, low cure rates, and temporary programs I would suspect that in 2010 more housing inventory is built into the schedule regardless of general improvements in the market.  In other words, don’t expect California housing to rebound in 2010.

rss-iconIf you enjoyed this post click here to subscribe to a complete ad free feed.

Popularity: 75% [?]

Related posts:

  1. California Inventory Jumps from 3.8 Months to 5.8 Months in January – Total California Housing Inventory 154,000 Homes. How Many Homes are in Mortgage Limbo and Don’t Show up in These Stats? If we take Distress Data About 793,000 Homes. Rarely do we ever see an actual total inventory report...
  2. San Francisco Shadow Inventory Larger than Regular MLS Data: How the Real Housing Inventory is Hidden from the Public. Once upon a time in California, housing prices aligned with...
  3. California Housing Inventory – 3.8 Months of Inventory if we only look at Public Data. The Financial Math behind California Home Prices and Artificially Low Inventory. Distress Inventory Still Dominating Market. For a state like California getting an accurate figure on...
  4. How Much California Inventory? 3.9 Months from Public Data. A drop from 6 Months at the Start of the year and down from 16 Months Reached in Early 2008. Yet Distress Properties are still a Big Part of the Market. According to recent data from the California Association of Realtors,...
  5. Los Angeles County has 2,205 Homes that are valued at $1 Million or More in Shadow Inventory. MLS Only Lists 32 Foreclosures with a Price Tag of $1 Million or Higher. Million dollar home sales in the state continue to fall. ...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

6 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. Schahrzad Berkland said:

    The San Diego #s are all wrong, including the trulia #s used by Amherst.

    SD inventory is 7800 and fell under 10k in July 2009.

    REO inventory is less than 10% of listings, so only 600 homes, not 5000 homes.

    I’m a realtor who writes housing reports every day, and I can tell you the “shadow” is in the NODs not given. There is no hidden REO inventory. I’ve spent hours, including going in the field and knocking on doors, to figure this out.

    October 23rd, 2009 at 12:07 pm
  2. Monica Meza said:

    So when will this shadow inventory be available on the MLS??
    We are waiting!

    October 23rd, 2009 at 1:27 pm
  3. jworm said:

    Schahrzad,
    I believe the REO listings column in the above chart are REOs that have been recorded but not listed for sale to the public. So they are properties that the Banks own and are just sitting on. That is a lot of inventory wasting away.

    October 23rd, 2009 at 9:07 pm
  4. ping said:

    banks should start paying fair (i.e. same as we pay) property tax on the properties they own and sit on.

    btw, here’s your additional tax revenue, governator – one way (more real estate taxes) or another (more home sale taxes).

    October 24th, 2009 at 12:26 am
  5. Ethan said:

    If I were running a bank, I would be very careful and hesitant about foreclosing. I would only foreclose on the most incorrigible borrowers or on choice properties I thought I could get rid of quickly.

    As the bank, if I foreclose on one house it brings down the values of all the other houses that I loaned money on. The other people in the neighborhood will be less and less inclined to hang in there and keep making payments the more the values of their houses fall.

    Imagine the effect on my collection of outstanding loans if I foreclosed and took back hundreds of thousands of properties and released them onto the market all at once. It would be devastating.

    That’s my theory on why there’s a huge shadow inventory that just seems to keep hanging around month after month. It doesn’t seem likely to me that there’s ever going to be an event like “the dam breaking” or a “tsunami.” Who would benefit from such an event? It’s much more likely that lenders will take back those houses as slowly and judiciously as possible, meanwhile hoping that the general economy will turn around and the shadow will gradually dissipate.

    October 25th, 2009 at 1:28 am
  6. robert said:

    go to realtytrac and get a trial account and see it for yourself. REO homes for each area are in thousands while the REO homes listed are in single digits.

    December 12th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

LEAVE A COMMENT

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Premium Sponsors

Most Popular Posts

Get a bad credit payday loan when you need it most.Apply for cash advances with no credit check.
Learn the ins and outs of stock options trading at bettertrades. Bettertrades is among top distance learning universities

Recent Posts