<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Finance my Money &#187; California inventory numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://financemymoney.com/category/california-inventory-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://financemymoney.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:09:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Bulk of Californians Bought or Refinanced During the Peak – 4.6 Million Moved into a New Housing Unit from 2005 to 2008.  1.7 Million Additional Homes priced under $249,000.</title>
		<link>http://financemymoney.com/the-bulk-of-californians-bought-or-refinanced-during-the-peak-%e2%80%93-4-6-million-moved-into-a-new-housing-unit-from-2005-to-2008-1-7-million-additional-homes-priced-under-249000/</link>
		<comments>http://financemymoney.com/the-bulk-of-californians-bought-or-refinanced-during-the-peak-%e2%80%93-4-6-million-moved-into-a-new-housing-unit-from-2005-to-2008-1-7-million-additional-homes-priced-under-249000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>myfinance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[alt-a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California distress properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California inventory numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market forecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interest rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financemymoney.com/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think looking deep into the housing data of California helps illuminate the story of the housing bubble, but also the drawn out aftermath.  Of the 12 million occupied units in California, over 4.6 million people entered their new housing unit between 2005 and 2008.  This occurred during the peak time.  So to really get [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "The Bulk of Californians Bought or Refinanced During the Peak – 4.6 Million Moved into a New Housing Unit from 2005 to 2008.  1.7 Million Additional Homes priced under $249,000.", url: "http://financemymoney.com/the-bulk-of-californians-bought-or-refinanced-during-the-peak-%e2%80%93-4-6-million-moved-into-a-new-housing-unit-from-2005-to-2008-1-7-million-additional-homes-priced-under-249000/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think looking deep into the <a href="../../../../../housings-treacherous-path-from-44-percent-homeownership-to-70-percent-the-levittown-dream-and-nothing-down-madness-how-a-nation-lost-its-way-with-homeownership/">housing data of California</a> helps illuminate the story of the housing bubble, but also the drawn out aftermath.  Of the 12 million occupied units in California, over 4.6 million people entered their new housing unit between 2005 and 2008.  This occurred during the peak time.  So to really get a sense of how many people over paid, we should look at the sales count from these years but also look at other data points to get a sense of where things are heading based on price and trends.  The most recent data shows us that <strong>one third</strong> of California homeowners with a mortgage are underwater.  This probably has to do with the big movement into these units at inflated prices:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/california-housing-units-bought.png" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-339" title="california housing units bought" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/california-housing-units-bought.png" alt="" width="491" height="394" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Source:  Census</p>
<p>Now we only have data running up until the end of 2008 but we already know where the trend has been heading.  As you can see from the above chart, the bulk of movement happened from 2005 to 2008 during the peak of the bubble.  It is safe to say that in many areas, 2004 was also a year with inflated prices.  So this can be extended further out.  It is also the case that some harder hit areas like the Central Valley are seeing home prices going back to 1990 levels.  You can only be underwater if you have a mortgage so let us look at more data breaking out ownership status in the state:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/california-housing-units.png" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-341" title="california housing units" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/california-housing-units.png" alt="" width="398" height="284" /></a></strong></p>
<p>The owner occupied rate fell throughout 2009 with the massive number of foreclosures continuing.  Let us look at annual resales:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2009-CA-forecast.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-342" title="2009 CA forecast" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/2009-CA-forecast.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="240" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Between 2004 and 2008 2.4 million resales occurred in <a href="../../../../../housings-treacherous-path-from-44-percent-homeownership-to-70-percent-the-levittown-dream-and-nothing-down-madness-how-a-nation-lost-its-way-with-homeownership/">California</a>.  It is hard to get an exact estimate here because we had many homes that sold multiple times during this timeframe.  But one thing is certain, many people locked in bubble prices for their home purchase.   Now the current Seasonal Annual Sales Rate (SAAR) is running much higher thanks to lower prices:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Market_at_a_Glance_2010-02.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-343" title="Market_at_a_Glance_2010-02" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Market_at_a_Glance_2010-02.jpg" alt="" width="402" height="302" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Yet that still leaves millions of mortgage holders under water.  One argument I have seen being made is that many bought before the bubble hit and never moved out.  <a href="../../../../../housings-treacherous-path-from-44-percent-homeownership-to-70-percent-the-levittown-dream-and-nothing-down-madness-how-a-nation-lost-its-way-with-homeownership/">The argument goes</a>, that these people are not underwater simply because they didn’t sell and supposedly have a low mortgage balance.  But as we know, there was an enormous amount of cash out refinancing and home equity loans that actually put people into the underwater category and these don’t register as home sales:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/mortgage-equity-tapped-out.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-344" title="mortgage equity tapped out" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/mortgage-equity-tapped-out.jpg" alt="" width="575" height="402" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Source:  Calculated Risk</p>
<p>Now this has added hundreds of thousands more into the underwater category.  In 2008, a year when prices were already correcting for California the median price was $467,000.  Since that time, the median price has fallen to $249,000.  If we look at the chart, when 2009 Census data is released this will mean over 1.7 million units (at least) were kicked from the higher priced sectors into the lower range:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/california-median-home-price.png" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-345" title="california median home price" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/california-median-home-price.png" alt="" width="430" height="483" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Now this above shift is important in understanding why sales have increased.  It has been driven by lower and lower prices.  And the California economy was booming during the bubble and many that bought, even prior to these inflated years, used the inflated prices to cash out.  The chart above clearly demonstrates the massive amount from the home ATM.  Yet that door has now closed.</p>
<p>I think what we will now see is a reality check with actual incomes.  We also tend to forget that the economy wasn’t all that good during the boom times at least when it came to wages for working Californians.  The only reason they were able to push prices so high was because of the criminally lax lending practices available.  Consider this for California:</p>
<blockquote><p>2000 monthly average unemployment rate:        4.95%</p>
<p>2008 monthly average unemployment rate:        7.22%</p>
<p>2009 monthly average unemployment rate:        11.425%</p></blockquote>
<p>The latest measure has the unemployment rate at 12.5%.  So the economy is even in worse shape and we will see this drag home prices lower.  The toxic mortgages like <a href="../../../../../the-option-arm-day-of-reckoning-for-california-is-here-60-month-window-opens-for-134-billion-in-recasts-why-option-arms-will-hit-mid-to-upper-priced-homes/">option ARMs</a> are banned from the system.  I think some hold this notion that we will somehow go back to “normal” times but mistake normal with a bubble.  Those days are over.  With the FHA and Fannie and Freddie hurting there will be more stringent requirements since banks are only making government backed loans.  They are at the mercy of the government and they should be, this is taxpayer money.  Do we want to go stated income and no money down again?  That has led to a financially disastrous place.</p>
<p>When we look at charts like the above, it is hard to see why prices will be moving up anytime soon.  There is an enormous amount of overpriced housing in the market.  The economy is stagnant and wages have fallen so this will end up reflecting in the price of homes.  A large part of recent purchases have come from investors.  Yet this has pushed rents lower.  Some think they will be flipping that home in a few years for a tidy profit.  If mortgage rates hit their 40 year historical average of 9%, I wouldn’t bet on it:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/30-year-mortgage.png" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-346" title="30 year mortgage" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/30-year-mortgage.png" alt="" width="600" height="360" /></a></strong></p>
<p>With the Fed coming to the end on the $1.25 trillion mortgage backed security quantitative easing program, rates have only one way to go.  And with massive deficits, it is hard to see how mortgage rates don’t go up especially with so many loans going bad (even just for the risk premium).  It is likely we will never see mortgage rates this low again in our lifetimes.  But this is not reason enough to buy an overpriced property like some would like you to believe. This is the same kind of allure used by those 0 percent credit card offers.  How well did that turn out?</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FinanceMyMoney" target="_blank"><img title="rss-icon" src="../wp-content/uploads/2009/09/rss-icon.jpg" alt="rss-icon" width="69" height="84" /></a><strong><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FinanceMyMoney" target="_blank">If you     enjoyed this post click here to subscribe to a complete ad free  feed.</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=3.3.2&amp;publisher=3046e02c-df23-407a-b1f5-9b82137c99ff&amp;title=The+Bulk+of+Californians+Bought+or+Refinanced+During+the+Peak+%E2%80%93+4.6+Million+Moved+into+a+New+Housing+Unit+from+2005+to+2008.++1.7+Million+Additional+Homes+priced+under+%24249%2C000.&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffinancemymoney.com%2Fthe-bulk-of-californians-bought-or-refinanced-during-the-peak-%25e2%2580%2593-4-6-million-moved-into-a-new-housing-unit-from-2005-to-2008-1-7-million-additional-homes-priced-under-249000%2F">ShareThis</a></p><img src="http://financemymoney.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=338&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://financemymoney.com/the-bulk-of-californians-bought-or-refinanced-during-the-peak-%e2%80%93-4-6-million-moved-into-a-new-housing-unit-from-2005-to-2008-1-7-million-additional-homes-priced-under-249000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Inventory Jumps from 3.8 Months to 5.8 Months in January – Total California Housing Inventory 154,000 Homes.  How Many Homes are in Mortgage Limbo and Don’t Show up in These Stats?  If we take Distress Data About 793,000 Homes.</title>
		<link>http://financemymoney.com/california-inventory-jumps-from-3-8-months-to-5-8-months-in-january-%e2%80%93-total-california-housing-inventory-154000-homes-how-many-homes-are-in-mortgage-limbo-and-don%e2%80%99t-show-up-in-these/</link>
		<comments>http://financemymoney.com/california-inventory-jumps-from-3-8-months-to-5-8-months-in-january-%e2%80%93-total-california-housing-inventory-154000-homes-how-many-homes-are-in-mortgage-limbo-and-don%e2%80%99t-show-up-in-these/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>myfinance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California distress properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California inventory numbers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distress property california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://financemymoney.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rarely do we ever see an actual total inventory report for California because this would require a count of each county in the entire state.  I try to track all this data in a spreadsheet since obviously the most important item we have in measuring California real estate is the actual quantity of homes we [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "California Inventory Jumps from 3.8 Months to 5.8 Months in January – Total California Housing Inventory 154,000 Homes.  How Many Homes are in Mortgage Limbo and Don’t Show up in These Stats?  If we take Distress Data About 793,000 Homes.", url: "http://financemymoney.com/california-inventory-jumps-from-3-8-months-to-5-8-months-in-january-%e2%80%93-total-california-housing-inventory-154000-homes-how-many-homes-are-in-mortgage-limbo-and-don%e2%80%99t-show-up-in-these/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rarely do we ever see an actual total inventory report for California because this would require a count of each county in the entire state.  I try to track all this data in a spreadsheet since obviously the most important item we have in measuring <a href="../../../../../california-notice-of-defaults-hit-record-foreclosures-hamp-loan-modifications/">California real estate</a> is the actual quantity of homes we have for sale on the market.  Last month, the amount of unsold inventory jumped from 3.8 to 5.8 months in January.  Part of this was because of the seasonal dip in home sales for December but also the elevated amount of homes for sale on the market.  Keep in mind that in the past the unsold inventory number would usually track down in the month as well as people would hold off on selling their homes.  Yet in this climate where a large number of home sales are distress properties, they are not pulled back during this typical seasonal fluctuation.</p>
<p>California still has many deep issues including a large amount of <a href="../../../../../big-loans-facing-big-problems-california-prime-jumbo-loan-defaults-rise-to-11-3-percent-putting-167-billion-in-loans-in-distress-california-holds-44-percent-of-prime-jumbo-loans-and-50-percent-of/">troubled loans in option ARMs</a> and other mortgage products that have extremely high default rats.  Let us first look at the latest snapshot from the California Association of Realtors:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/car-california-housing-inventory.png" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-307" title="car california housing inventory" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/car-california-housing-inventory.png" alt="" width="573" height="419" /></a></strong></p>
<p>Aside from the seasonal fluctuation, the seasonal home sale rate has fallen by 10 percent from this time last year.  This can be from an exhaustion of home purchases and all the additional government programs set in place to spur home buying.  The median home price has been pushed up from this point last year but has fallen from last month.  The amount of unsold inventory did move up again last month.  Let us first crunch that number since this is such an important point in determining how many homes are for sale in California:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/total-inventory.png" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-308" title="total inventory" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/total-inventory.png" alt="" width="304" height="309" /></a></strong></p>
<p><em>Source:  MLS</em></p>
<p>In total, California has over 154,000 homes listed on the MLS.  Yet this number in itself doesn’t tell us the actual amount of inventory on the market.  We then need to look at the number of homes sold statewide last month:</p>
<blockquote><p>January 2010 CA Home Sales:                     27,858</p>
<p>After getting this number we merely divide by the amount of total inventory:</p>
<p><strong>154,717 / 27,858 = 5.5 months</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>This number is fairly close to the 5.8 months reported by the CAR.  In a healthy housing market anything below 6 months of inventory is a good number.  Yet this market is anything but healthy.  In fact, we really need to get a better understanding of the market regarding negative home equity but also, how many homes are in distress that aren’t listed on the MLS.</p>
<p>A study from Arizona State University examines negative equity from MSAs (metropolitan statistical areas) and finds that the bulk of them are here in California:</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/underwater-chart.png" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-309" title="underwater chart" src="http://financemymoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/underwater-chart.png" alt="" width="594" height="467" /></a></strong></p>
<p><em>Source:  ASU<br />
</em></p>
<p>Now this chart is crucial in determining the path ahead because it gives us a sense of how many more distressed properties we can expect in the year to come.  If we look at Merced California, 85 percent of mortgage holders are underwater.  Couple this with an unemployment rate of 17 percent and you can understand why some areas are going to see low home prices for a long period ahead.  And the study from ASU and other institutions shows that negative equity is the number one factor in predicting future foreclosure.  This makes sense.  If you are in trouble and have equity, all you need to do is sell.  But when you are in a position where you owe more than your home is worth, selling isn’t an option unless the bank approves a short sale and this seems to be a new path ahead.  How big of an impact this will have is yet to be seen.</p>
<p>So how many homes are in distress in California?  This is hard to say.  Yet even if we take nationwide statistics and apply them to the state, we know that the number of homes in trouble is extremely large:</p>
<blockquote><p>“(<a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/02/mba-1405-percent-of-mortgage-loans-in.html" target="_blank">Calculted Risk / MBA</a>) The delinquency rate includes loans that are at least one payment past due but does not include loans in the process of foreclosure. <strong>The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process at the end of the fourth quarter was 4.58 percent</strong>, an increase of 11 basis points from the third quarter of 2009 and 128 basis points from one year ago. <strong>The combined percentage of loans in foreclosure or at least one payment past due was 15.02 percent on a non-seasonally adjusted basis, the highest ever recorded in the MBA delinquency survey</strong>.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Now this is nationwide data.  So let us apply this number to the amount of California mortgages (the distress rate in California is much higher because of loans like <a href="../../../../../the-option-arm-day-of-reckoning-for-california-is-here-60-month-window-opens-for-134-billion-in-recasts-why-option-arms-will-hit-mid-to-upper-priced-homes/">option ARMs</a>):</p>
<p>California</p>
<blockquote><p>Housing Units with a mortgage:                 5,290,276</p>
<p>MBA Nationwide data on 1 payment behind and foreclosure (15%)</p>
<p><strong>Total potential pool of current distress California homes:            <span style="color: #0000ff;">793,541</span></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Now take that above number and compare it to the 154,000 homes currently listed on the MLS.  In other words, the potential for distress inventory hitting the market for years to come is enormous.  It already appears that banks won’t flood the market but with this amount of people 1 payment behind or in foreclosure, California housing will be depressed for years to come.</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FinanceMyMoney" target="_blank"><img title="rss-icon" src="../wp-content/uploads/2009/09/rss-icon.jpg" alt="rss-icon" width="69" height="84" /></a><strong><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/FinanceMyMoney" target="_blank">If you enjoyed this post click here to subscribe to a complete ad free feed.</a></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=3.3.2&amp;publisher=3046e02c-df23-407a-b1f5-9b82137c99ff&amp;title=California+Inventory+Jumps+from+3.8+Months+to+5.8+Months+in+January+%E2%80%93+Total+California+Housing+Inventory+154%2C000+Homes.++How+Many+Homes+are+in+Mortgage+Limbo+and+Don%E2%80%99t+Show+up+in+These+Stats%3F++If+we+take+Distress+Data+About+793%2C000+Homes.&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ffinancemymoney.com%2Fcalifornia-inventory-jumps-from-3-8-months-to-5-8-months-in-january-%25e2%2580%2593-total-california-housing-inventory-154000-homes-how-many-homes-are-in-mortgage-limbo-and-don%25e2%2580%2599t-show-up-in-these%2F">ShareThis</a></p><img src="http://financemymoney.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=306&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://financemymoney.com/california-inventory-jumps-from-3-8-months-to-5-8-months-in-january-%e2%80%93-total-california-housing-inventory-154000-homes-how-many-homes-are-in-mortgage-limbo-and-don%e2%80%99t-show-up-in-these/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: financemymoney.com @ 2012-05-21 19:24:32 -->
